Panificadora Emanuel: Repeated Oven Gas Consumption Results

Field case study · Industrial bakery

Panificadora Emanuel: repeated oven gas-consumption results

Across three oxyhydrogen-assisted production cycles on a metered industrial bakery oven, average natural-gas consumption was 27.6% lower than the natural-gas-only baseline, while average baking time was 3.5% shorter.

Field testing on a metered Mecanomega 2 industrial bakery oven compared natural-gas-only operation with on-site oxyhydrogen assistance. The latest production dataset adds three repeated hamburger baking cycles to the earlier heating comparison.

ElectrolyzerW installed beside the industrial oven burner at Panificadora Emanuel

ElectrolyzerW installation beside the Mecanomega 2 oven burner in Bogotá, Colombia.

Tested equipmentMecanomega 2 industrial oven
Baseline gas use2.746 m³ per hamburger cycle
Assisted average1.989 m³ across three cycles

Repeated production-cycle results

The comparison used one natural-gas-only hamburger baking cycle as the baseline and three oxyhydrogen-assisted cycles. Every assisted run used less natural gas than the baseline.

Natural gas only

Gas consumed
2.746 m³
Baking time
663 seconds
Product
Hamburger buns

Natural gas + oxyhydrogen

Average gas consumed
1.989 m³
Average baking time
640 seconds
Measured gas range
1.957–2.036 m³

Measured outcome

  • 27.6% average reduction in natural-gas consumption versus the baseline cycle.
  • 3.5% shorter average baking time—640 seconds versus 663 seconds.
  • 28.7% best gas reduction among the three assisted runs.
  • 11.8% best time improvement—585 seconds versus 663 seconds.
  • Two of the three assisted cycles finished faster than the natural-gas-only baseline.

Earlier heating and croissant-baking comparisons

Earlier tests recorded additional time improvements under different protocols. They are reported separately from the newer repeated hamburger-cycle dataset because the products, endpoints, and operating conditions differed.

Oven heating event

Natural gas only
7 minutes
Natural gas + oxyhydrogen
4 minutes
Time reduction
42.9%
Gas reduction
16.7%

Croissant baking test

Natural gas only
19.5 minutes
Natural gas + oxyhydrogen
15 minutes
Time reduction
23.1%
Time saved
4.5 minutes

The croissant comparison also recorded natural-gas consumption of 2.673 m³ without assistance and 2.379 m³ with assistance—an 11.0% reduction for that measured batch.

Mecanomega industrial oven evaluated at Panificadora Emanuel
Mecanomega industrial bakery oven.
Dedicated gas meter used in the Panificadora Emanuel evaluation
Dedicated natural-gas meter used for test readings.
Oven temperature control display during testing
Oven temperature display during field testing.

What the results support

The repeated production cycles provide stronger evidence than a single demonstration: all three assisted runs reduced gas consumption by approximately 26–29%. The dataset supports continued controlled evaluation of oxyhydrogen-assisted combustion as a retrofit approach for suitable industrial ovens.

Application-specific result. These measurements apply to the tested oven, product, settings, meter, and operating conditions. They do not guarantee the same savings for another oven or facility. Efena evaluates each host system and establishes a project-specific baseline before recommending configuration or estimating performance.

Could your thermal process be evaluated?

Begin with a technical takeoff covering the equipment, fuel, operating schedule, location, and recent consumption data.

Start a technical takeoffView all case studies

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *